Wednesday, January 11, 2006

The Radical Tory Manifesto

We, the undersigned, unite together with burning concern for the future of our country, with firm loyalty to her institutions, and firm hope for our future.

With burning concern, we note the state into which our country has fallen. We see the breakdown of family life, the loss of confidence in our institutions, the decay of public and private virtue, and the attack by an ideologically driven and squalid oligarchy on the common good. We refuse to swim with the tide, taking our stand instead on the solid ground of the Permanent Things, to which we pledge ourselves, and from the foundation of which we defy and transform our culture.

We recognise the inate dignity of every human being, as God-given, from conception to natural death.

We strongly affirm the integral place of the natural family in our common life, affirming marriage and family life as the foundation of society. We consider that the natural family, and the marriage which binds it together, is entitled to the highest consideration and the protections of the civil government.

We declare our allegiance to custom, convention and continuity, even in reform, and joyfully receive the rights of free Englishmen guaranteed us by Her Majesty our Queen, under Magna Carta and the Act of Settlement. We affirm that the civil and religious rights guaranteed by them lie at the heart of our national life.

We deny the vapid utopianism of our political masters, recognising that human beings are imperfectible. We further recognise the variety of social conditions in human society, affirming that true equality is only possible before the Courts and before God. Thus, we oppose government-driven attempts at levelling, while affirming our desire to seek Justice.

We uphold the role of the pillars of social order; that is, Her Majesty the Queen, the Police, the Armed Forces, and the other agents of the civil government in its proper, limited sphere. We uphold the institutions of civil society and moral order, such as the Church and the voluntary institutions which make up the Community, and deny the impulse of the collective.

We recognise our duty to each other, and reject moral and social individualism. We recognise the need for restraints upon power and passion, and therefore support the balanced Constitution and the rule of law.

We, who stand at the cusp of the Third Christian millennium, are the inheritors of the trust of our ancestors, who spilled their blood in defence of freedom and our Most holy faith. We who have received the burning torch from them, will not let it die, but will pass it stronger and brighter to those who will come after us. We will strive to be worthy of their trust.

In token of which, and with trust in God, we have this day set our names.

William Pitt the Younger (originally posted by Pitt here)

10 comments:

  1. Beautiful. I might create a similar manifesto for those of us on this side of the Pond with similar beliefs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I read this long ago, and printed it, too; and leave my comment here as another affirmation of my dedication to it.

    This speaks for me.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I should clarify that this was not written by history's William Pitt, but by one of our New Zealand contributors, who took "Pitt" as his nom de plume.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yeah, I know! The Third Christian Millennium part gives it away.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have also just printed this off for my personal use and put a copy of it on my own blog. It is a wonderful charter for traditionalists all over the Anglo-sphere.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Under the monarchs own laws she cannot extend her dominion past the British Isles, in fact merely Ireland , Scotland and England. when the rest of the "commonwealth " find out there will be hell to pay!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous:

    Your understanding of history is utterly squalid, and your understanding of how the Commonwealth works even more so. So I'll make it simple: She's the Queen of certain former colonies because we've decided to keep her in that role. Her position as head of the Commonwealth was by agreement of the member states, but does not give her any authority over their governments where such is not permitted by the laws passed by their own officials. The suggestion that she has any kind of authority over the President of Uganda would likely amuse him and come as news to her. Bottom line: her dominion is perfectly legal in those countries that have chosen to retain her as head of state, and unrelated to her ceremonial position as head of the Commonwealth. So, no, there won't be any "hell to pay." Strike three, you're out.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Allow me to affix my name to this statement.

    God Save The Queen!

    ReplyDelete
  9. This speaks to my heart. Thank you for publishing a blog full of quality articles. "Modern life" can feel very frustrating at times but it's nice to be reminded one isn't alone in clinging to traditional ways or having morals, dignity and a sense of duty.

    ReplyDelete
  10. A bit late, but I actually posted this years ago on my blog.

    I, Jovan-Marya of the Immaculate Conception Weismiller, T.O.Carm., proudly subscribe to the Radical Tory Manifesto!

    ReplyDelete