But before we do, it is important to remember the seriousness of the defeat that republicanism faced at the referendum in 1999. If you have a passing interest in Australian psephology, I strongly recommend this article on the referendum results by leading electoral analyst Malcolm Mackerras here. Additionally, this article explains the propensity of Australians to vote “no” – regardless of the issue at hand.
That was ten years ago. So what lies ahead for the monarchy in Australia?
First, republicans know they don’t have a model that they know can win. They know that a president chosen by politicians is a vote loser. But they seem unwilling to commit to a president chosen by popular vote. Why? Because such a change would be even more radical than the 1999 proposal – and would probably go down to a substantial defeat after being subjected to the white heat of a referendum campaign. Direct election is apparently popular now – but other referenda proposals have had high levels of support that evaporated in the lead-up to a vote. This conundrum ties the republicans up in knots.
There is also no political will to revisit the issue. Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull (both republicans) have said that the issue is not a priority. In fact Turnbull has gone further by saying that the time is not right for a republic during the reign of the present Queen. This policy shift by Turnbull – who led the republicans before and during the 1999 campaign – is extraordinary.
Even then, as retired Major-General Mike Keating, head of the Australian Republican Movement says: "…if Charles and Camilla take over, the old Aussie ethos will say: he's in there now and maybe he won't be such a big dolt now that he's the monarch; it's only a fair thing to give the man a go …"
Finally, I have my own theory. Despite having a notionally republican Prime Minister, we have had a large number of royal visits this year. In January, we expect Prince William on a brief tour of Sydney and Melbourne. It has been reported that Prince William’s visit is his own initiative, and was then approved by Rudd’s office. Usually royal visits are at the initiative of the government at the day, but this one has come from Buckingham Palace. Why? Because I think the Palace now believes that due to the reasons above, if all things remain equal, William will almost certainly be the King of Australia one day, regardless of the government of the day. Pleasingly, it seems the Windsors are on the verge of returning to a normal transmission – of sorts.
Welcome Crux Australis!
ReplyDeleteThe republicans are getting very excited over the latest UMR poll which they claim shows 59% of the population support a republic. The problem is while they claim UMR have released this poll, it is not up on their website so we can't analyse the results. The UMR polls are online surveys as opposed to the more traditional polling methods which both Newspoll and Morgan claim give better results.
ReplyDeleteDirect election is popular, until you point out this would result in an American style president. The best way to sow doubts on the minds of the populace I find is to summarise the republic thusly:
What do we get if we vote Yes? More election campaigns, more politicians, more bureaucrats, all with more power.
A president elected by the people will have a larger mandate than the Prime Minister, have supremacy over parliament and be the Commander and Chief of the armed forces.
Thanks Tweesmuir. I have previously posted on this site as '99 Referendum Veteran but took up The Monarchist's kind invitation to post on the 10th anniversary. This is my nom de plume going forward.
ReplyDeleteLord Best - yes you are right the ARM has been splashing the UMR poll around a lot. But the "gold standard" of Australian political polling is Newspoll. Stick with that and you will know what is what. So what do we find on Newspoll's polling on republicanism?
We find that (a) they haven't polled since 2007 (no life left in the issue), and (b) the No vote is the highest recorded since 1994. Not by much, admittedly - and certainly within the margin of error. But if Newspoll is no longer showing a majority support for "the republic" in the abstract, you know the ARM is in serious, serious trouble.
As David Marr said in his SMH article I linked to - if you weren't around in 1975 you don't think much of the idea. My controversial view is that demographic change is ultimately on our side, not the republicans. And I think that the Palace has now "sussed" this one out.
PS Lord Best: have a look at Mackerras' article that I linked to. The republican vote comes in the bottom third of least popular referendum proposals (another sign of the resilience of the No vote in the face of media bias, etc) - but look even further down.
ReplyDeleteBelow you will see a handful of proposals put in the 1988 referendum - At least one of them - the one on four year terms I think - started with 80% support, but a handful of weeks later was thrashed at the polls. There is more than enough evidence that an effective "no" campaign will break the back of any "yes" vote in an Australian referendum campaign.
Truly, Australia's republicans look like having nowhere to go. The sentimental royalists that collect commemorative royal china might be dying out fast - but the critical mass of ardent at-any-cost republicans needed to campaign for and secure a win is disappearing much, much faster.
Right now, Kevin Rudd is just about the best friend Prince William could have.
Yes, welcome aboard, old veteran of constitutional wars. What a splendid pen name, if I may say so. An excellent start of a post too. Welcome!
ReplyDeleteKate, asks the the Queen for her views on what will make her and Will's marriage the best marriage within the Royal family.
ReplyDeleteThe Queen looks up at Kate whilst continuing to pat the Corgies and says:
WEAR YOUR SEATBELT AT ALL TIMES
AND DON'T PISS ME OFF!
I have been here reading for about an hour. I am a newbie and your success is very much an inspiration for me
ReplyDelete