In the event of the heir to the throne contracting a civil partnership, any progeny of that marriage by adoption or artificial insemination should qualify to inherit the throne.
Why stop there? What about the possibility of discrimination against conjoined twins, transgender persons or hermetically sealed 'bubble boys' (or is that bubble girls?). No doubt British MPs have already put a stop to this ridiculous tampering, which could lead to endless difficulties as the contents of the bill have already been approved in principle by all the independent realms of the Crown Commonwealth. There was always a danger of proceeding down this path, but now that we have, one wonders what amendments will be entertained elsewhere, especially in those realms where the monarchy is not as sacrosanct as it mostly is in the UK. This definitely has the potential to get ugly before it gets interesting.
It's too informative.Thanks to share this great information.
ReplyDeletebuilders contractors warwick qld
Given the sheer number of recognized heirs to the throne, it wouldn't seem to be an issue if the Monarch had to adopt, resort to extensive fertility treatments or have no children at all. More scandalous, to my mind at least, would be if any non-inheriting children were treated with any less love and care than if they were in the line of succession.
ReplyDelete