Yet I am simply unwilling to pit my infinitely tiny and temporary mind against the manifest scholarship and accumulated wisdom of such a deeply pious and holy man. It is indeed with mixed feelings, but I suppose we must humbly accept the Pope at his word when he says that he was not prepared to see the Church suffer as a result of his increasing frailty. Personally, I would never have thought such a thing myself—if anything, when the pontiff has been noticed to suffer, as Pope John Paul II did in his final years, there is an increased reverence which just might translate into more recruitment from a faithless world.
Progressives will no doubt laud this as a triumphant decision, and a step in the right direction. If they hope this announcement might lead to a more reformist type to take the reigns of spiritual and moral power, they shouldn't hold their breath. We traditionalists know that path is doomed, one that will inevitability undermine the indestructible magic of the Pope's office. That was the great understanding of this Pope; in the short time that he was there, His Holiness did much to shore up the faith and that most inspiring institution:
Benedict XVI's achievements as pontiff have been remarkable. He has renewed the worship of the Church, reconnecting it to the majesty and deep piety of the past. He has forged new links with non-Catholics, for example by bringing ex-Anglicans into the fold through the Ordinariate. He has promulgated teaching documents reconnecting the love and teaching of Christ to the structures of the Church – structures that, it would appear, he feels now unable to continue ruling.If there is to be a blessing from this news, it is assumed that Benedict XVI will have immense influence on who his successor will be, and therefore project his power on the future of the Church longer than if he stayed until his mortal end and heavenly beginning. If this is true, then we are dealing with one crafty Pope, and traditionalists have every reason to feel upbeat about today's astonishing decision.
David Warren teaches that there is no such thing as "abdication" from the Papacy for it is not a "worldly monarch".
ReplyDeleteIf our Queen became unable to do her duties she would remain Queen in name and have a Regent as George III did at the end of his time as King.
ReplyDeleteI think you are right, David, that HM will stay until the very end, come what may. She will no doubt continue to pass much of the daily hack work of royalty to her heirs and successors in the years ahead as required.
ReplyDeleteToo bad there is not the imagination to appoint a royal GG for Britain (or in the very old parlance, a Lord High Steward of England), with the effect of equalising the monarchy in the UK with its status in the overseas realms.