Thursday, April 30, 2009

Inevitability of Republics?

. Thursday, April 30, 2009

Here's a good question that many republicans in the Commonwealth these days seem rather quick to avoid: WHY is a republic inevitable in New Zealand, Australia, Canada, even Britain? What makes a republc inevitable? How is the march of republicanism so supposedly unstoppable? We at the Monarchist certainly don't see it as inevitable, as we resist it at every turn, to the best of our abilities. So why, then, is there this perception that republics are inevitable?

Turning our gaze to history, it rather seems to me that the fall of republics is inevitable. Rome started out as a republic, but when a suitably strong single figure emerged from the ceaseless infighting of a republic in crisis, Octavian in Rome's case, it became a rather fair, pseudo-constitutional monarchy of a sort. That is, until the Emperors became rather more... forward with their power, later in the Empire's history. The English Republic of the two Cromwells was rather short-lived. France would be the most famous example of this occurance, it's republics having been toppled by external and internal pressures no less than three times. Spain has been a republic twice, and both times the republic fell, and the monarchy restored (though the dictator Franco did not allow a monarch until 1975). And let us not forget the fall of the Weimar Republic that allowed the rise of Hitler. A republic seems a rather unstable thing to me. The only one two that have truly stood a test of time have been Switzerland and the United States, and one of those is rather insignificant on the world stage. And the American Republic has had it's brushes with destruction as well, witness the American Civil War.

So why, then, is the American system of republic seen as something implacable and unstoppable. Once, people thought that communism was the same way, and that did not spread across the civilized world as people thought it would. So why, then, do the people of New Zealand and Australia, and even Canada and Britain think that a republic will eventually happen? I mean, it's not as if we are somehow oppressed by our distant Monarch. The Royal Family costs us nothing, and provides a vast array of benefits in return, which are too numerous to list here, and indeed have been ennumerated several times before here at the Monarchist. What is this obsessing with streamlining and cutting down, of 'trimming the fat' of society, as it where? Of removing everything that isn't strictly necessary. It is true that our democracies would get along without Her Majesty, they'd be damaged and malfunctioning, but they'd get along. To go back to my metaphor of food, imagine that you are sitting in a fine restaurant. You have ordered the prime rib. Now imagine that your meal arrives and you discover than some overly-judicious and health-conscious cook has trimmed every last bit of fat from your prime rib, as well as deprived your table of butter and salt with which to season your roast potato, and you have been robbed of any Yorkshire pudding. Perhaps, in the strictest sense, this is 'healthier' for you, but will you not have been robbed of much flavour, taste and enjoyment in your meal? The same is true of a monarchy that has been 'republic-ized'. Sure, maybe things will be a bit more efficient, but will things truly be better if the aristocracy of peerages and royalty is replaced with that of Hollywood and the media? Will things be better with the 'Australian Republican Guard' rather than the Royal Australian Regiment? We will lose so many of the little niceties and finer points of life by transforming into a typical gormless, feckless, unadorned republic.

And we would lose the Duke of Edinburgh, and his delightful vocalness and frankness about his views. And who would want to live in a world where such a gentleman as he is not in the public view?

In any case, I pose the question to you, Monarchists, why do you think republics are perceived as an inevitable step 'forward'?

21 comments:

Anonymous said...

"inevitable" doesn't it sound just so damned certain? So why bother to fight it?
Seems a rather useful ploy to utilise if you're that way inclined. It is only perceived that way because republicans say so every time they talk to the media - 'perception is reality' after all, especially in politics!

Kipling said...

You suggest it in your article. Many Repubicans are influenced by Marxist or Communist ideology, so they view their particular world view as inevitable. It's a teleology very reminiscent of religion, except most religions are far more rational and objective than Marxism. Republicanism, for most republicans, is part of a jacobin desire to remark the world accordingly to some Platonic ideal, living breathing humanity be damned.

The facts don't matter, the dialectic process of republicanism shall triumph though only only a handful of republics have anything like a serious track record. You mention Switzerland and the US, there are also micro states like San Marino. France is today a republic solely because of the efforts of de Gaulle, who styled himself in the manner of a monarch.

Lord Best said...

Well, part of it I think is laziness. If it is inevitable you do not actually have to do anything to bring it about, so republican commentators can just sit back and make snide remarks about Royalty. If it is not inevitable, then you actually have to do things, an no republican wants that.
It is also part ideology. In their minds a republic is some gleaming, shining example of democratic goodness that will right all wrongs and cure all evils. They can not comprehend how any right thinking person could object, so they kid themselves that everyone feels they same way.

James said...

I wonder if the general Americanisation of the world over the past half century has anything to do with it. Given the steady and unstoppable erasure of various local traditions around the world by the introduction of Coca Cola, McDonald's, Hollywood, and the like, it thus appears inevitable that the world will similarly embrace from the dominant American media that country's disdain for elites (hypocritical as it is), belief that the individual trumps society (self-destructive as it is), and their idea of democracy residing only truly in revolution and the results of a popularity contest (selfish and inherently combattive as it is). Commonwealth republicans, who've obviously been dazzled by America's legends, thus possibly believe that all they have to do is sit back and ride the wave.

J.K. Baltzersen said...

Gentlemen,

As has been touched upon in the comments prevously, it is in large part a debating trick.

If you can build a perception that a concept does not belong in our time, you don't have to argue for why your concept is better than that concept. Laziness, as mentioned by "Lord Best."

radical royalist said...

Republican want to discourage us. In the case of Australia the mantra of the inevitable republic, that the media and most politicians throw at us is not only annoying, it is highly stupid.

Though it might have some effect, I consider the republican slogan offensive, because it deprives people to for their own opinion. The opinion is pre-fabricated and disallows counter arguments. If you are a Monarchist, you stand against the course of time. You are not "one of us". It si already called "un-Australian".

Gladstone said...

I don't understand how they could paint the Monarchy as 'un-Australian', given that the Queen is Queen of Australia too, and Queen of Canada, and Queen of New Zealand, and Queen of the United Kingdom. Given that Britain has given Australia it's language, traditions, culture and form of government, and indeed Britain's monarch has reigned over Australia for it's entire history as a colony and as a dominion. After all that, it seems odd to think of the Monarchy as 'un-Australian'.

But then, these are republicans, they are not always what we would call 'logical'.

Lord Best said...

Republicans here will say anything. We just had a senator at the commission-thing examinining the possibility of a plebiscite claim Canada is a republic. That takes a special sort of person.

Gladstone said...

Special kind of person called a shameless liar.

Or a dolt.

One of the two.

J.K. Baltzersen said...

Gentlemen,

When an untruth comes across, the sender has one of the following relations to it:

1. He believes it himself, and confidently so.
2. He knows it isn't exactly so, but believes the twisting of the truth is insignificant.
3. He knows it might not be so, but takes the chance that he will get away with not checking.
4. He knows it absolutely isn't so, and he believes he can get away with it.
5. He doesn't give the idea that he might be twisting the truth a thought, as he is "running on auto-pilot."

It is quite unbelievable what one can get away with in a debate.

We must also remember – in all humility – that even posts here will be perceived as not giving the whole picture. You can always add more detail, definitions, and nuances.

I think it is better to play along than to run around shouting "foul play." That is not say that we should start consciously lying.

As an example, humor can be applied as response to many claims. Humor can often make the opponents look like fools, whereas humorlessly pointing out untruths often may make us seem a bit grumpy.

The trick is to turn their arguments around so they come back like boomerangs in their faces.

Lord Best said...

Gladstone, I prefer to think of them as 'shameless dolts'.

'99 Referendum Veteran said...

For boomer republicans in Australia, republicanism is "brand differenatiation" for them from their parents, as were Mavis Bramston, Vietnam marches, Number 96, loving Gough, the Dismissal...

The self-absorbed boomers can't bear the idea that they aren't the logical conclusion of history and modernity. Acceptance of the rejection of a republic would symbolically represent that. Which I think is why boomers are predominantly republican - they can't bear that idea. And why the generations on either side, are not.

David Byers said...

I always thought the old “it’s inevitable” was a way of making monarchist give up, sort of “what’s the point of putting time money and effort into something that has no chance of winning”. It is also a way of saying that one part of the population holds views that are invalid. Fight it!

Anonymous said...

I disagree with the statement about the Royal Family costing "nothing". At the very least the Governor General is an expense.
As for why some people would desire to be a republic... National sovreignty would certainly be a valid reason. Each time Canada wants to create new federal laws they need to ask a representative of Queen Elizabeth the Second to sign it into law.

Marquis Black said...

To anonymous:

I'm curious. Are you all actually afraid they'll break decades of precedent and say no? Or is it the principle of the concept of sovereignty?

I just feel it's odd for a modern republican to claim any such thing, since most of them also argue for globalization, which embodies the single most destructive force towards national sovereignty the world has ever seen.

I mean, if republicans are going to argue for republics, they shouldn't do it in this damn silly way, if there's any merit in their arguments at all. It's hypocritical, illogical, and damned silly.

Anonymous said...

My issue would primarily be soverignty and an honest assessment of expenses.
As for globalization... in which regard do you refer to?
I have little fondness for the U.N. at the very least they have proven to be toothless and quite possibly disgustingly corrupt.
I think free trade is great to an extent. I don't think it's prudent to sell a knife to somebody who would be likely to stab you with it.
I can't help but to wonder how the points I mentioned would be "hypocritical, illogical, and damned silly."

Anonymous said...

"France would be the most famous example of this occurance [sic]..." Occurrence is so spelt, Gladstone.

Anonymous said...

Gladstone: "I don't understand how they could paint the Monarchy as 'un-Australian', given that the Queen is Queen of Australia too, and Queen of Canada, and Queen of New Zealand, and Queen of the United Kingdom...."

It gets back to education, as it usually does. Now generations of Australian youth have not been taught to regard the monarchy as a national, and therefore Australian, institution, as once the monarchy was taught in Australian primary and secondary schools. So the monarchy is perceived as "foreign" and distant from national life, an anachronistic institution left over from colonial times to be rejected and eventually discarded. This is of course very wrong, but that it is how it is seen by two generations of Australians that have been "educated" over the last 40 to 45 years. That is what has happened in Australia, at least; naturally, I cannot speak for other countries. And Australians can thank their left-wing academics and teachers for that: these destroyers of young minds have moulded, and in the process ruined, primary and secondary education here in Australia since the end of the 1960s.

Anonymous said...

Gladstone: "I don't understand how they could paint the Monarchy as 'un-Australian', given that the Queen is Queen of Australia too, and Queen of Canada, and Queen of New Zealand, and Queen of the United Kingdom...."

It gets back to education, as it usually does. Now generations of Australian youth have not been taught to regard the monarchy as a national, and therefore Australian, institution, as once the monarchy was taught in Australian primary and secondary schools. So the monarchy is perceived as "foreign" and distant from national life, an anachronistic institution left over from colonial times to be rejected and eventually discarded. This is of course very wrong, but that is how it is seen by two generations of Australians that have been "educated" over the last 40 to 45 years. That is what has happened in Australia, at least; naturally, I cannot speak for other countries. And Australians can thank their left-wing academics and teachers for that: these destroyers of young minds have moulded, and in the process ruined, primary and secondary education here in Australia since the end of the 1960s.

Anonymous said...

Every society seeks its elite. In the US it is the business and military heroes, hollywood and entertainers. In North Korea it is the descendants of their dictators. Even the classless communist societies had their dacha-loving 'cream'. Abolishing the monarchy would naturally lead to a vacuum that will inevitably be filled by some other sort of elite: that of the Chinese style, Korean style, American style or even the Indian style. And if you study all these elites, you will find that they serve no useful purpose to their society; they are hardly role models; they will not inspire a street dog to defend its territory, much less inspiring the yeomen to defend their country; they will hardly have a cultural standing worth remembering two days after their death. Now, if someone wants to abolish a popular monarchy, that is not power-hungry, that is not vile or corrupt like the politicians, and that can still inspire men to lay their lives in defending their land, and to put in its place any of the above 'elites', that shows there is something seriously wrong with them; their mean spirit cannot bear seeing a king or queen praised for just being there. They cannot see farther than the tip of their nose and realize that abolishing the monarchy will not end elitism but will start a horror wave of neo-elites: all with ambition but none with the strength of character or the nobleness of purpose, an elite that will not automatically put the interest of their country before their own interest.
God indeed save the British from themselves.

Anonymous said...

I do not believe that "strength of character or the nobleness of purpose" are genetic traits.

Post a Comment

 

Monarchist Labels

Monarchist Articles

2010 ARTICLES

Tony Abbott: Australia's 'mad monk' close to election victory
Dear Guardian: Get out of Oz or shuffle off the coil
Kid Genius: "All monarchists are either stupid or evil"
Republican Vultures: Australia should go republic after Queen dies?
Princess Royal: Hardest working Royal, Princess Anne, Turns 60
Much-Abused Imperial Poet: Rudyard Kipling unburdened
Admiral Cod: Wilfred Thesiger, Archeo-Traditionalist
Diamond Jubilee: Bring Back the Royal Yacht Britannia
On Flickr: The British Monarchy's Photostream
Buck House: No Garden Party tea for BNP leader, Nick Griffin
In Quebec: The Queen is still Wolfe in sheep’s clothing
Queen's PM: Australia will not vote on ties to British monarchy
Camelot: Historians locate King Arthur's Round Table?
Royal Neglect: Is Britain becoming a republic by default?
Monarchy or Anarchy? No third option explains David Warren
Charles vs Modernists: God Bless the Prince of Wales!
After Her Majesty: Who will wear the crown in Canada?
Bargain for Britain: And for the Commonwealth Realms
Queen's Prime Minister: Harper advised by "ardent monarchists"
Muddled Monarchist: A troubled and confused loyalist
Loyal Subject: God Bless Her Majesty!
Queen's Prime Minister: Harper really loves the Queen
Crown & Pants: She wears the crown and he wears the pants
The Maple Kingdom: The ‘iron cage’ of the colonial past dissipates…
The Crown Knows Best: It all Begins and Ends with Monarchy
White Rose Day: Burke's Corner on "Sorrowing Loyalty"
Happy B'day Grand Old Duke: It's a pity they don't make his kind anymore
Saved by the Crown: What monarchs offer modern democracy
Queen's Speech: Black Marks, Brownie Points at the State Opening
The Navy's 100th! Restore the honour 'Royal' Canadian Navy
Happy Birthday! Her Majesty The Queen turns 84.
Abolish the Commons: Suicidal tendencies of the modern political class
Labour Vandalism: Plans to abolish the House of Lords
Lord Black: "The ultimate degradation of the 'white man's burden'"
Old Etonian: Guppy the Ex-Bullingdonian speaks of his loyalty
Duchess of Devonshire: bemoans the demise of the Stiff Upper Lip
Queen Victoria: A film remarkable for its lack of anti-British prejudice
Climate Imperialism: Rich nations guilty of 'climate colonialism'
Bye Bye Britain: The UK officially not a sovereign state
Monarchy Haters: A Strange Form of Bitterness
Royal Intrigue: The secret plot to deny the Queen the throne
Never mind the Queen? Summing up Daniel Hannan in four words
Queen & Country: David Warren on a Big Lie finally corrected
Defending the Royals: Repatriate the Monarchy argues Andrew Coyne

2009 ARTICLES



Classic Warner: The other November the 11th
Brave Loyalist! Lone woman takes on anti-Royal mob in Montréal
Loyal Subject: Evaluating the monarchy against their own little worlds
Death so Noble: An 'almost divine act of self-sacrifice'
Crux Australis: Howard revisits his victory over the republic
Lord Ballantrae: The Would-Be King of New Zealand
Lord Iggy: Anti-Monarchist Leader of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition
Old Etonian: A modern-day Lawrence of Arabia?
Sir Keith Park: The Commonwealth's Finest Hour
Buckingham Masjid: Buckingham Palace under the Shariah
The Maple Crown: Our ties to monarchy are bigger than the royals
His Tonyness: Holy Roman Emperor, Leader of Progressive Humanity
Young Fogey: Rafal Heydel-Mankoo on Chretien's Order of Merit
He's not a snob, Bob: Why does Canada cling to British colonial roots?
Fount of Justice: Crown sidelined from new Supreme Court
The Clown Prince: The world’s third longest-serving head of state
Hell, Britannia, you’re just nasty: Licence to make crass sexual jokes on the BBC about the Queen is depravity, not liberty
Loyal Subject: The Governor General can't take the Queen out of Canada
Save Our Dukes: Return peerage appointments to the Queen
Lord Black of Crossharbour: Why I became a Catholic
Not Amused: Her Majesty "appalled" at the direction of her Church
A Sad Day in Pretoria: When South Africa Lost its Star
The Queen Mother: Noblesse Oblige vs the Me Generation
Aristocrats: A review of Lawrence James's new book in the FT
Crown and Shamrock: Irish went underground to view coronation
Bye bye Camelot: Obituaries on Ted Kennedy here, here and here.
Scotch Whisky Do not boycott for ye Scots had precious little to do with it
Loyal Subject: God (and Young Liberals) saving the Queen
Aussie Monarchist: A good bloke calls it a day
Blog of the Order: This man can redesign our blog any time he wants
Lord Black: Much ado about the Republic of China
Stalwart Jacobite: But has no problem with Elizabeth II of Canada
Royal Commonwealth Society: Join the Conversation
H.M.A.S. Sydney: Inquiry blames captain for worst naval disaster
Imperial Constitution: Was the American Revolution avoidable?
Hero Harry Patch: Saying Goodbye to All That
King and Country: The 250th Anniversary of the Battle of Minden
King's College: Crosses Return to the Columbia Crown
Lord Salisbury: An interview with the 7th Marquess of Salisbury
Queen's Commonwealth: Quaint historical relic or meaningful bloc?
Queen's Prime Minister: Chrétien's perplexing gong
Why Ma'am Must Stay: The New Statesman is foaming at the mouth
Happy We-Should-Restore-The-Monarchy-And-Rejoin-Britain Day!
CinC: The Queen's Broadcast to Her Armed Forces around the World
Elizabeth Cross follows a tradition that started with Crimean War
Dominion Day: Canada was an act of divine loyalty
LOYAL SUBJECT: A GOOD DAY IN CAPE TOWN
The "Whaddever Monarchy": A Prince and his indulgent public
English Constitution: A written constitution is not the answer
Rest in Peace: Roméo LeBlanc, former governor general, dies at 81
Prince of Wales: Who, apart from the Prince, speaks up for beauty?
Queen's Prime Minister: New Zealand restores Queen's Counsel
Why I accepted my OBE:Radical feminist Marxist accepts "cruel imperial order"
On Lord Loser: Modernist architects carry on where the Luftwaffe left off
The Puissant Prince: Thanks to Prince Charles for meddling
"It's our republic"? It's our monarchy, not a dance with republican elites
Grand Old Duke: Happy 88th Birthday to Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh
Warner: It is time for the Queen to dissolve Parliament.
Royal Fix: Prince Charles resolves diplomatic impasse.
Not Amused: France admits snubbing the Queen.
Useless Monarchy? Prince Charles is taking on the starchitects...and winning.
Vice-Regal Salute: Governor General of Canada least boring vice-regal ever
Loyal Subject: For genuine patriots pride in the monarchy is fundamental
Cranmer: The Mother of Parliaments has become a whorehouse of ill-repute
Poet Laureate: Will ignore royal events if they don't inspire her
Grand Old Duke: The longest-serving royal consort in British history.
Keep our Feudal Failsafes: Monarchy is not a game of 'fair'
Farewell to Helen Clark: "I deeply detest social distinction and snobbery"
Eco-Monarchy: A not completely irreverant look at the future King
Voyage Through the Commonwealth: World cruise around the faded bits of pink.
The Equality Bill: A real nasty piece of work by the Lord Privy Seal
Laughter from the Gallery: Canada's a Republic, claim Australian politicians.
Peter Hitchens on America: Canada and America, two ideas of how to be free.
Let's Not: If the disappearance of newspapers is inevitable, let's get on with it.
Strange Bedfellows: No friend of monarchy, but...we admired the good bits
King Harper: A Parliament of Potted Palms.
Keep our Feudal Failsafes: Monarchy is not a game of 'fair'
Gentleman Royalist: Theodore Harvey is baptised an Anglican
Farewell to Helen Clark: "I deeply detest social distinction and snobbery"
Republican humour: Keeping monarchy means we don't have confidence
Eco-Monarchy: A not completely irreverant look at the future King
Catholic Tory: Amend the Act of Settlement - but not yet
Why you should still read The Guardian: Let's hear it for mad monarchy
Reform the Monarchy? Let's wait another century, says Lord Rees-Mogg
Not Amused: Mr. Rudd, and his totalitarian certainty
Irish Blues: Ireland out in the cold over British Monarchy debate
Act of Settlement: Here's a Tory view, and here's a Whig view
Lord Black: The magnificent absurdity of George Galloway
Vice-Regal Saint: Remembering Paul Comtois (1895–1966), Lt.-Gov Québec
Britannic Inheritance: Britain's legacy. What legacy will America leave?
Oxford Concision: Daniel Hannan makes mince meat of Gordon Brown
Commonwealth Voyage: World cruise around the faded bits of pink.
"Sir Edward Kennedy": The Queen has awarded the senator an honorary Knighthood.
President Obama: Hates Britain, but is keen to meet the Queen?
The Princess Royal: Princess Anne "outstanding" in Australia.
H.M.S. Victory: In 1744, 1000 sailors went down with a cargo of gold.
Queen's Commonwealth: Britain is letting the Commonwealth die.
Justice Kirby: His support for monarchy almost lost him appointment to High Court
Royal Military Academy: Sandhurst abolishes the Apostles' Creed.
Air Marshal Alec Maisner, R.I.P. Half Polish, half German and 100% British.
Cherie Blair: Not a vain, self regarding, shallow thinking viper after all.
Harry Potter: Celebrated rich kid thinks the Royals should not be celebrated
The Royal Jelly: A new king has been coronated, and his subjects are in a merry mood
Victoria Cross: Australian TROOPER MARK DONALDSON awarded the VC
Godless Buses: Royal Navy veteran, Ron Heather, refuses to drive his bus
Labour's Class War: To expunge those with the slightest pretensions to gentility
100 Top English Novels of All Time: The Essential Fictional Library
Royal Racism? Our intellectually febrile self appointed arbiters of modern manners
The Story of Bill Stone, RN: "Contented mind. Clean living. Trust in God"
Bill Stone: Last British veteran of both world wars dies
Reverse Snobbery: "Prince William and Harry are not very bright"
Poet Laureate: The English-Speaking Peoples need a poet laureate
Prince Harry: Much Ado about Nothing
H.M.A.S. Sydney: Australia seeks answers to its worst naval disaster
BIG BEN: Celebrating 150 Years of the Clock Tower
Winnie-the-Pooh: Canada's famous bear, Winnie (Winnipeg), to be published in a sequel
Not Amused: Traditional fairytales are not politically correct enough for our children
The British Empire: "If you were going to be colonized, you wanted to be colonized by the British"
Gross Constitutional Impropriety: Without mandate for change, plebiscites work to undermine the system


2008 ARTICLES


Count Iggy: Michael Ignatieff takes the reigns of the LPC
Lord Black of Crossharbour: Harper and Ignatieff promise a rivalry for the ages
Strange Bedfellows: The monarchy is safe from this republican
Fount of Dishonour: The growing distinction of remaining an unadorned Mister
Republican Poet: Colby Cosh on that mute inglorious Milton
Church of England: The Conservative case for the Established Church of England
Liberal Secular Scrooges: A Blight on the Festive Landscape
Fount of Honour: The Queen's New Year Honours List
Act of Settlement: the last brick in a crumbling wall, by Philip Lardner
What next, Mr. Hannan, the conservative case for disestablishing the monarchy?
Hair to the Throne: Prince William's beard is fit for a King.
Canada's House of Lords: Why reforming the Senate is profoundly unwelcome.
Someone who gets it: The proper relationship between liberty and democracy.
More Pseudo Democracy: Keep on voting until you get it right.
Royal Christmas: Queen's Christmas Message still trumps seasonal schedule.
Archbishop Williams: A 'certain integrity' to a disestablished Church of England.
Loyal Subject: Debunking the antimonarchist claims of The Economist.
Royal Prerogative: Grand Duke says no to legalised murder assisted suicide.
Lord Iggy: The Nobleman versus the Doberman
It's Over: the day, the decision, the crisis, the coalition, and Dion’s leadership
Loyal Subject: Speak out Charles, our teenage politicians never will
Prince Charles at 60: 60 Facts About HRH, Prince Charles of Wales
Remembrance Day Hymns: O Valiant Hearts; Abide With Me
For Liberty and Livelihood! Duke of Norfolk leads hunt protest ban
Keating Remembers: "I have never been to Gallipoli, and I never will"
John Cleese a Republican? An anti-monarchist rant worthy of Monty Python
Balfour Declaration: The precursor to the Statute of Westminster
Beaverbrook's Grandson: SAS Major Sebastian Morley resigns in disgust
"His Mightiness": Yanks and the royals; the Eagle and the Crown
England Expects: The Hero of Trafalgar at 250
Harper and Howard: An embarrassing example of Anglosphere Unity
Crowning Insult: Labour's legacy will be its destruction of the monarchy
Her Excellency: An Interview with Governor-General Quentin Bryce
Age of Oversensitivity: Churchill wouldn't stand a chance in Canadian election
William of Wales: Prince chooses RAF career over that of a 'working Royal'
Australia's Loyal Opposition: Republican Turnbull now on Queen's side
Loyal Subject: The Age of Elizabeth II, by A.N. Wilson
Tory Icon? Daniel Hannan says British Tories should follow Stephen Harper
Chasing Churchill: Around the world with Winston
Her Majesty The Queen - A Life in Film
The Crown in Oz: Australia swears in first female governor-general
Lèse majesté? The Royal Australian Institute of Architects drops the 'royal'
Rest In Peace: David Lumsden of Cushnie (1933-2008), President of the 1745 Assn.
Monarchies Rule: Prominent Australian republican says monarchies are the best
Sir Don Bradman: Oz remembers The Don, the greatest cricketer batsman of all time
Padre Benton: The Living Tradition in Piddingworth
"Stodgy anachronism" More moist, vapid effusions from the Diana cult
Drool Britannia: London Summer Olympics 2012
Taki the Aristocrat: Unrepentedly wealthy and well mannered
Wanted: Uncorker Message in a bottle faster than Royal Mail
The Other St. George: Will Georgia restore its monarchy?
Gentlemen's Clubs: The Great Club Revolution of New York
The Laughing Cavalier: What an utterly absurd article
Health unto His Future Majesty: "Royalty dares to challenge the New Order"
"Grace, Your Grouse!" Better to kill a fellow gun than wing a beater
Boys will be adventurous: To Ulaanbaatar by London cab
A King's Breakfast: A trenchant defence of the full English breakfast
Republican beer: Forget Coopers, support Fosters
Trafalgar Square: Sanity prevails on the fourth plinth
The Empire Builder: How James Hill built a railroad without subsidies
"Harvard was not amused": Alexander Solzhenitsyn, 1918–2008
Greatest Briton: Wellington is "greater than Churchill"
Death of the Necktie? A well-tied tie is the first serious step in life
Not Amused: The next Chief Justice of Australia to be a republican
Royal New Zealand Air Force: God Save N.Z. from the Cannibals
Why English Pubs are Dying: The totalitarian smoking ban.
Swooning over Princess Obama: A Coronation or the Second Coming?
Dreams of an Academic: Gough Whitlam to have the last laugh?
Joshua Slocum meet President Kruger: Yet another reason to love the Boers
Changing of the Guard: Annual Inspection at Rideau Hall
H.M.S. Iron Duke: A Foe for William and Sea Room
Fountain of Honour: Australian pop star gets Order of the British Empire
DOMINION DAY: Read David Warren's Lament for a Nation
Kiwi Tribalism: Sealords, Treelords, what are New Zealanders coming to?
Of Queen and Country: John Elder disects the current state of monarchy in Oz
Not Amused: The Olympic Games trump Buckingham Palace
CMR Returns: The Royal Military College of St. John
Hereditary peers overwhelmingly rejected the Lisbon Treaty
Archbishop Cranmer: Royal Assent given to the Treaty of Lisbon
Crown Commonwealth: Referendum confirms Her Majesty as Queen of Tuvalu
Duke of York: Prince Andrew Visits Troops in Afghanistan
Treaty of Lisbon: A Litmus Test for the British Monarchy
The Queen and I: The man who caused royal kerfuffle gives view of the monarchy
HMS Ontario sunk in 1780, found intact! at bottom of Lake Ontario
Hold the Lime, Bartender: Only lemon properly complements a gin and tonic
Elizabethans Down Under: Are most Australian monarchists merely "Elizabethans"?
Edwardian Gentleman: What To Do When You Find a Hohenzollern in Your Study
Hooray for Kid's Day!! Melbourne newspaper won't come of Age
Unhappy Kingdom: Why Liberal Democracy is Failing Us
Knightless Realm: The world yawns as John Howard is made an AC
Scots Tory: Bring Back the Stiff Upper Lip, says Gerald Warner
HMY Britannia: Let's lay the keel for a new royal yacht
For Queen, Country and Low Pay: PM pledges to do better
Maple Leaf republic? Roger Kimball's sleight of hand (since corrected!)
Queen's Birthday: New Zealand unveils new Vice-Regal Standard
Prince Charming: Quebec author calls Canadian G-G a "negro queen"
The Senior Service: Sub-Lieutenant Wales to take on Pirates of the Caribbean
Crown of Disenchantment: What does it require to withhold royal assent?
Colonial Mentality: Key republican thinks Victoria Cross is a colonial relic
The Red Baron: Billy Bishop, not Mannock, was the British Empire's top ace
Which Scots conservatism: Unionist or Nationalist?
Loyal Subject: After all she has done, we owe the Queen our oath
Victoria Day – Fête de la Reine: Official B'day of the Queen of Canada
Renaming the Victoria Day Weekend: Let's get rid of Heritage Day Bob
Pro Valore: Canada mints its own Victoria Cross in time for Victoria Day
State Visit to Turkey: Mustafa Akyol says God Save the Queen, Indeed
Norn Iron Unites: What issue is uniting all parties of Northern Ireland?
Extreme Loyalist: Michael Stone attempted to slit the throats of Adams and McGuinness because he just "can't handle" republicans being in government.
Canada's Vice-Regal dubbed an elegant mix between Lady Di and Nelson Mandela
Queen of Australia: Support for Australian republic hits new low
A Heroes Welcome: The Windsor Castle Royal Tattoo, 8-10 May 2008
Fat, Vile and Impudent: Alan Fotheringham is back on the bottle
The Devine Right of Bling: Our Royals have become hereditary celebrities
Battle of the Atlantic: Canadians remember the longest battle of WW2
Old Etonian Toff: Boris Johnson installed as Tory Mayor of London
Britain needs a Patron Saint: Cry God for Harry, Britain and St. Aiden?
Anglos in Mont-Royal: Rooting for the Montreal Canadiens
Daniel Hannan: Borders of the Anglosphere and the British Empire was a mistake
Australia 2020: One Big Fat Republican Con Job
Bye bye Tommy: O it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Tommy go away"
For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?
Carpetbaggers Down Under: Kevin 'Mugabe' Rudd wins 98.5% support for republic
Kipling: The Jeremiah of Empire and the Poet Laureate of Civilisation
Duke of Edinburgh: Behind the gaffes is a man of real sincerity
Lord Rutherford: The Father of the Atom lives on in great great grandson
Queen of Australia: Royalty Protects us from Tyranny, David Barnett
Long Live the Broadsheet! Norumbega, more traditionalist than the Pope.
A Tale of Two Countries: Soldiers of Britain and Canada serve the same Queen but...
Loyal Subject: Polishing the Royal Crown, Matt Bondy & Brendon Bedford
Devoted to the End: Obituary of Sir Phillip Bridges
The Monarchist does not recognize the Republic of Kosova
Loyal Subject: MPs Ruse Defeated; God Save the Queen!
St. Paddy's Day: Edmund Burke, the greatest Irishman who ever lived
Not Amused: The Bunkum of Timothy Garton Ash
Hero Harry: Rave Reviews across the Commonwealth
Patriot Prince: Prince Harry fought for us all, Charles Moore
William F. Buckley, RIP: He had a Tory gratitude for the pleasures of life
Their Lordships' Duty: The House of Lords can influence the Lisbon Treaty debate
Knights of Oz: Revive Sirs or I'll have your guts for garters
Peter Hitchens: People love the Queen...and the BBC hates us for it
Our Greatest Monarch: Paul Johnson says Henry V was our greatest monarch
Princess Diana Inquest: A Dirty Raincoat Show for the World
Malcom Turnbull: 'Queen's death will spark republican vote'
Duke of York: The Royals are not "stuffed dummies". They should have their say
Peers of the Realm: The decline and fall of the House of Lords - Charles A. Coulombe
Peter Hitchens: Get rid of the monarchy and you will get rid of a guardian of liberty
THE FALL OF CHURCHILL
Honouring Sir Edmund Hillary
The Queen versus an E.U. President
Going Solo: Prince William earns his Wings
James C. Bennett: The Third Anglosphere Century
Knights of Oz: Revive Sirs or I'll have your guts for garters
Princess Diana Inquest: A Dirty Raincoat Show for the World
Malcom Turnbull: 'Queen's death will spark republican vote'
Future Peer: The life and times of Lady Victoria Beckham
Peers of the Realm: The decline and fall of the House of Lords - Charles A. Coulombe
Peter Hitchens: Get rid of the monarchy and you will get rid of a guardian of liberty


2007 ARTICLES


New York Times: Ever Backwards into the Royal Future
Peter Hitchens: People love the Queen...and the BBC hates us for it
Christopher Hitchens: An Anglosphere Future
Andrew Cusack: Republicanism is a traitor's game
DIAMOND WEDDING ANNIVERSARY
Courageous Patrician: Rt Hon Ian Douglas Smith (1919-2007)
The Last Rhodesian: What began with Rhodes and ended with Ian?
Gentleman Journalist: The Lord Baron W.F. Deedes, 1913-2007
Not Amused: Blair's sinister campaign to undermine the Queen
Loyal Subject: Queen Elizabeth: A stranger in her own country
Reverence Deference: Bowing and Scraping Back in Tradition
Rex Murphy: Kennedy, Churchill, Lincoln - The rousing bon mot is no more
Gerald Warner: Don't shed a tear for Diana cult in its death throes
The End of Grandeur: Rich, chincy Canada puts Strathmore on the blocks
Confessions of a Republican Leftie: "The Queen charmed the pants off me"
The King's Own Calgary Regiment: Cpl. Nathan Hornburg is laid to rest
The Royal Gurkha Rifles: Prince William grieves the death of Major Roberts
Queensland Mounted Rifles: Trooper David Pearce, 41, killed in Afghanistan
The Order of Canada: 100 investitures later, Canada's highest honour turns 40
Prince Edward on Prince Edward Island: Troop's link to monarchy important
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN: Unveils the UK Armed Forces Memorial
Great Britain: "A rotten borough with a banana monarchy" - by Europhile
FADE BRITANNIA: THE UNION OF ENGLAND AND SCOTLAND IS OVER - Simon Heffer
Peers of the Realm: The decline and fall of the House of Lords - Charles A. Coulombe
Remembering 'Smithy': An obituary tour de force by Andrew Cusack here, here and here.
NOT AMUSED: Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Quebec not invited to Quebec's tercentenary